Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bronze statues in Romania

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Bronze statues in Romania[edit]

Per COM:FOP#Romania: copyrighted statues, created less than 70 years ago.

* File:Grupul statuar Familia Brâncoveanu2.jpg

Eleassar (t/p) 07:50, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Symbol delete vote.svg Delete the following:
but Symbol keep vote.svg Keep the following:
Razvan Socol (talk) 17:35, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. Agree for the second one, disagree for the first one: the image description makes it clear that the object of interest was the statue. --1Eleassar (t/p)
What does the description has to do with De minimis? That picture is the definition of the third criteria: "Copyrighted work X is identifiable, but is a small part of a larger work, so that the larger work cannot easily be shown without showing X. X is a part of the larger work, and its inclusion is unavoidable."--Strainu (talk) 19:37, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
It is rather very unlikely de minimis: "Copyrighted work X is a key part of the subject (eg it is the reason for taking the photo). Removing it would make the derivative work radically different, but potentially still useful." The statue has not been included in the image incidentally and could not be at will replaced with another work. --Eleassar (t/p) 19:43, 14 October 2013 (UTC)



Symbol delete vote.svg Deleted, but two kept. Borderline case, but it seems to me, that Parcul Areni2 is de minimis. The main object is park here. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 23 October 2013 (UTC)